Dr. Kimberly Kagan
The advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve U.S. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.
http://www.understandingwar.org
Hello Institute for the Study of War,
I have just discovered your organization via the BBC. Currently Military Science has not recognized that there is an in continuo Chemical Assault - Scorched Earth in the United States. This is an alter ego component to Syria and ISIS.
Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC is allegedly a Membership of Cambridge Law School lawyers who plan the expansion of the British Empire. This includes the map and boundary locations of Syria, Israel, and India.
I have included Chapter 4 of the Fall of the Anglo American Paradigm.
I have the entirety of Akbar one of the components of MOEC imposed over my person, which is the Chemical Assault. I am near Lake Almanor, California and it is contaminated.
MOEC is a prisoner's dilemma based defection model that will explain international relations down to local crime.
Your group appears to have specialization in Mid East Relations.
This is very serious. There is very little doubt that the United States is committing War Crimes by non military grade Chemical Assaults world wide. The British have become intelligence hegemons and have penetrated EVERY POLICE STATION worldwide in an Undermining Campaign.
MOEC has a Strategic Mission of Gay Marriage. It is being operated out of LAPD. All the members of the MOEC cells are MSM.
I am heterosexual and a Hare Krishna. This results in a very sharp psychological operations against actual standing law and identity.
I grew up in Delaware. Vice President Biden is one of the most experienced persons in International Relations in the United States. His son Beau is a JAG and Attorney General of Delaware.
We lived in the same neighborhood the year 1972 that he won his first term. His wife and daughter were in an auto accident this year.
All blockades and prophylactic barriers eventually break. Censorship and Sanitization develops a culture of tit for tat reprisals and is regressive.
Official Recognition should result in a War Crimes Tribunal. This would be unilateral here in the United States and probably the United Nations worldwide.
I am arguing that the United Kingdom is the authorship and proximate cause sine qua non and liable for criminal and civil actions.
Thank you for your consideration.
Bhakta David Nollmeyer
Lake Almanor California
June 18, 2014
Fall of the Anglo American Paradigm
Chapter 4
The Anglo American Oprichniki
The Rise and Fall of the British Empire is the mechanism that has triggered the Fall of the Anglo American Paradigm. It is the allegation that Cambridge Law School is the social architect for this nation-state's behavior. Hence, Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC is the stage of evolution that the Membership have developed in furthering this goal (Nollmeyer 2013a).
The case argues that these actors lead by Cambridge Law school and Trinity College staff have orchestrated War Crimes in the trajectory of the United Kingdom. The opposition by the Christian theologians aided in the creation of the mechanism to expose MOEC through tit for tat reprisals that radiate from the Membership into Informants worldwide. The story The Yellow Brick Road is an analogy and appears to have been intentionally embedded in the culture to demonstrate the strategies and tactics of Empire. Here there is a distinction between the Gemienschaft culture and conversely the modeling of Systems and the Social Contract theory as Gesellschaft. Herein it is evident that the lawyers were not interested in being exposed and prosecuted for War Crimes (Tonnies 2014).
It appears that their knowledge of the superiority of MOEC's defection powers aided these actors to entrap and expose the United States and it's President if they were exposed. At the abnormal psychology level this will confirm the modeling and existence of a male Muchasen by proxy syndrome. Here specifically MSM males are focalized.
Under social engineering one orchestrates a War Crime and Crime Against Humanity and then attempts to take credit directly of vicariously through a system of informants.
Hence, this is a modern variant of Plato's Master Passion (Plato 360 BCE):
Tyrant
Secret Police
Informants
Here the main co principals or accomplices are listed:
Soho - Scotland Yard Officers - These actors have not been relevant in my perspective
Periander - LAPD Officer to about 1980 before The Fly
The Fly - LAPD Officer who initiated Manifest Function on June 17, 1987
Dodo - LAPD Officer
The following are articles from the Nuremberg principles (Nuremberg principles).
Principle VI
Principle VI states,
"The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of
international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime."
Nuremberg Code
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM NOTE (Nuemberg Code)
On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings.
[FROM TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS BEFORE THE NUREMBERG MILITARY TRIBUNALS UNDER CONTROL COUNCIL LAW NO. 10. NUREMBERG, OCTOBER 1946–APRIL 1949. WASHINGTON, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.]
PERMISSIBLE MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS
The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Of the ten principles which have been enumerated our judicial concern, of course, is with those requirements which are purely legal in nature — or which at least are so clearly related to matters legal that they assist us in determining criminal culpability and punishment. To go beyond that point would lead us into a field that would be beyond our sphere of competence.
http://powereality.net/anglo-american.html
Labels: censorship, cutural singularity, ethics, human rights
