Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Stalin and Censorship as a Model

Joseph Stalin is an important figure in using the state as instrument to censor and control mass perceptions. The conditions in the Unites States demonstrate an imitation and mimicry of certain historical tactics that have worked in the short term to hide and distort actual historical events that did occur to institutionalize mechanisms of abuse. This is done by developing traits that are inherent in the human species and other cultural behaviors and indentities that are learned through a continuum of experience.

Wikepedi, which is an open source internet encyclopedia begins the discussion on censorship as such:

Censorship is the use of governmental power to control speech and other forms of human expression. It is most commonly applied to acts which occur in public circumstances, and generally involves a suppression of them by criminalizing their expression. What is censored may range from specific words to entire concepts, and the ostensible motive of censorship is to stabilize or improve the society over which the government has control.

Sanitization (removal) and whitewashing (from whitewash) are almost interchangeable terms that refer to particular a form of censorship via omission, which seeks to "clean up" the portrayal of particular issues and facts which are already known, but which may conflict with the official point of view. Political correctness may also become a form of censorship.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship

The beginings of Stalinism in the 1920s demonstrates the inefficiency of state employees that helps lead to conditions of censorship.

In the United States censorship begins with a culture that is dependent on tacit deals with corrupt officials which at times include non-cash rewards as jobs that are harder to trace. The aperture for a movement to correct this deficiency beigns by exposing persons and culture groups that have taken "deals" for drug dealing, prostitution, and gambling. These groups can easily be purged by the System with no noticeable loss in degree to either side. What is unique is the camoulflage and the folly is the willingness to dehumanize and participate in a minor purge. What is evident is that who was in power stays in power although with minor sustainable damage. The scapegaots are the scapegaots with a few prizes who are individual deafeated but institutionalization and systematizing the mechanism is strengthened.

The police here LAPD are a minor group that represents Gay facism. They are tyranny of a minority under a tyranny of a majority, the Democrats and Republicans and other static members of society. This position is centered on species failure and not any other political ideology. The Delaware State Police are set up to be the heores but are in actuality implicated. Intermediary are the Baltimore Studio which uses a Synclavier sampling piano to mutilate evidence. The Baltimore Police are remain in the background.

The best class as a group are those persons under 14 years of age. College age persons are openly recruited and are every bit as bad as any civil rights disorder of the 1960s of which students state they helped support. This a case of reversed polarites and being dependent puppet actors of this mechansim which is defection under prisonner's dilemma.

Sheila Fitzpatrick writes in Everyday Stalinism Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s:

Their lives were tossed around by Communist policies; their tempers were tried on a daily basis by incompetent and arbitrary officials, clerks, and salespeople, all working for the state. This was the omnipresent context of Soviet everyday life; there was no way to live without it. Thus, our story begins with an overview of the Stalinist regime and its institutions and practices, particularly the Communist Party's style of rule and mentalité.

technocrati tags:

1 Comments:

Blogger mikeelikesit said...

There is a resounding desire for meaningful free roll tournaments in which online gambling players at all levels have the opportunity to compete in tournament play when the prize money is huge... but the buy-in is somewhat prohibitive for most.

12:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home